|
|
No. 849
##The
jury system
In Japan, national judicial participation is
wrestled with as well as the unification of the
lawyer.
The part includes " the trial member system " but to
start by this system, May, 2009 is decided.
It is possible to say a kind of the jury system of
this trial member system.
Actually, to call a jury system existed in the past
Japan, too.
In the criminal trial, it introduced a jury system
to 1943 from 1928 and it was actually implemented
but it becomes because of the confusion by the war
as stopped.
It is the " Hara Takashi " Don't-Know one that made
efforts toward the introduction of the jury system.
He is the person who spent a political life on this
jury system.
There former state of things still is a judiciary in
the present Japan.
There is a good surface, too, but the senselessness
of the judge becomes a problem on the one hand.
It should be possible to call that the movement to
say to let's reconsider a judicial participation
system here in を appeared a request in the times.
It is with OBJ DO and worldwide seeing uncommon what
that it says that it makes a layman participate in
the judiciary including the jury system and it is
Class which gets a citizenship already in
America, the United Kingdom, Canada, Australia,
Mexico, France and so on.
The jury system in Japan is pros and cons.
Originally, because it is the Japanese the principle
of whom is to be judged in " on the justice " to the
style which is attended by the Samurai movie, it may
be the race which the fact to be judged by the
layman has resistance.
Also, " the jury system " is Class which
decides the guilt of the defendant and guiltlessness
by the verdict of the juror.
That is, it is a majority vote.
How will it say that it decides the lifetime of the
person by the majority vote?
It is a floret without that it is possible to crawl
when the posture to investigate the truth as
expected is necessary.
Also, it says that there is an effect to prevent
from a false charge ( the innocent sin ) by but it
isn't possible to crawl in case of not being when
there is danger that the feelings increase a false
charge, twining oppositely, too.
It is that the act to buy, too, is thought of.
In any case, it thinks that to say that the people
participate in the judiciary is a good thing.
To participate in how form will be the problem in
the future which it should think of by the entire
people.
2005/01/31 |
|
|
Posted by
TAMAGOYA
|
|
|
|
